[anonsec] BYPASS OR PROTECT

[Julien Laganier]

On Friday 13 April 2007 18:15, Nicolas Williams wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 11:01:25AM +0200, Julien 
Laganier wrote:
> > > What's the status of the core I-D?
> >
> > Nico, the WGLC concluded on 2007-04-09, hence I
> > thought the WG would request publication of the
> > core I-D to IESG.
>
> OK.
>
> > Does the discussion you and Steve have had so far
> > impact that?
>
> No, it does not.
>
> >              In other words, should we delay
> > submission of the core I-D to IESG?
>
> Nope.  I think it's ready.

Before I forward it to IESG, I need you to resubmit a 
new version of the draft that passes all IDnits 
checks:

<http://tools.ietf.org/tools/idnits/>

It currently has 4 errors:

- No 'Intended status' indicated

==> Use "std" as category in the XML's <rfc> mark (e.g. 
<rfc category="std" ipr="full3978" > )

- Lack an IANA Considerations section

==> If the document hasn't IANA considerations, include 
an IANA cons section stating "This document has no 
IANA considerations"

- Bad Normative/Informative ref split causing downrefs.

==> I think [I-D.ietf-btns-connection-latching], 
[I-D.ietf-btns-prob-and-applic], 
[I-D.ietf-kitten-gssapi-channel-bindings], and 
[I-D.ietf-nfsv4-channel-bindings] are Informative 
rather than Normative...

- Normative reference to obsolete RFCs (RFC 2408 and 
RFC2409)

==> Suggest removing them, or move to Informative?

Once those are taken care of, I'll forward the draft to 
IESG.

--julien / BTNS co-chair.