[anonsec] Fwd: [openikev2-announce] New versions released !!!

[Stephen Kent]

At 4:55 PM -0500 7/27/07, Yoav Nir wrote:
>As long as it's running code...

Windows is running code too, but it's not an IETF standard :-).

If CheckPoint wants to declare something it implemented as being 
BTNS, despite the lack of an IESG-approved document, and in light of 
the ongoing changes to the document, I guess it's a good marketing 
ploy, if not good IETF behavior.

>We've had IKEv2 interoperability workshops months before RFC 4306.

Before the RFC was issued (after several months in the RFC Editor's 
queue), or before the document was approved by the IESG?

>There are also lots of implementations of SCEP and that hasn't made 
>it to historic yet.

That's an irrelevant example, i.e., a protocol developed outside the 
IETF which may be published as historic, as a compromise.

Steve