[anonsec] (resend) Problem/Applicability Statement WGLC summary and RFC publication request

[Yu-Shun Wang]

Hi,

The -05 version was submitted back in Feb. 13, which
should address the few comments brought up during WGLC
(ended Dec. 4, 2006):

- Wording adjustment in the abstract to cover both pre-shared
   secret and CA-signed certs for authentication. Re:
   <http://www.postel.org/pipermail/anonsec/2006-December/000913.html>

- Minor wording changes to regarding TCP-specific mods vs. HIP. Re:
   <http://www.postel.org/pipermail/anonsec/2006-December/000915.html>

The full diffs between -04 and -05

<http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-btns-prob-and-applic-05.txt>

The authors think the doc is ready and would like to request
the publication of this doc as RFC.

Thanks,

yushun