[anonsec] (resend) Problem/Applicability Statement WGLC summary and RFC publication request

[Julien Laganier]

Folks,

If nobody objects to publication of 
draft-ietf-btns-prob-and-applic as an informational 
RFC before March 21st, we will submit the draft to the 
IESG.

Best,

--julien, BTNS co-chair

On Tuesday 06 March 2007 02:53, Yu-Shun Wang wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The -05 version was submitted back in Feb. 13, which
> should address the few comments brought up during
> WGLC (ended Dec. 4, 2006):
>
> - Wording adjustment in the abstract to cover both
> pre-shared secret and CA-signed certs for
> authentication. Re:
> <http://www.postel.org/pipermail/anonsec/2006-Decemb
>er/000913.html>
>
> - Minor wording changes to regarding TCP-specific
> mods vs. HIP. Re:
> <http://www.postel.org/pipermail/anonsec/2006-Decemb
>er/000915.html>
>
> The full diffs between -04 and -05
>
> <http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=http://tools.iet
>f.org/id/draft-ietf-btns-prob-and-applic-05.txt>
>
> The authors think the doc is ready and would like to
> request the publication of this doc as RFC.
>
> Thanks,
>
> yushun
>
>
> _______________________________________________