[anonsec] Typo in core draft
Nicolas.Williams at sun.com
Thu Jan 17 02:16:38 PST 2008
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 07:23:28PM -0500, Sam Hartman wrote:
> + bind the same public key. These certificates need not to have been
> + pre-shared with their peers (e.g., because ephermal, self-signed).
> The current text sounds like a requirement that certificates are not
> shared with peers. I think it's more like "These certificates do not
> need to be "
Yes, that's correct -- the word "do" is missing and should be inserted
before "need to be".
> Am I correct on this point? If so, feel free to either submit a new
> ID or give me an rfc editor note to apply in the tracker.
The note is this:
Add the word "do" before "need to" in the last sentence of the
parapgraph that starts "Nodes wishing to be treated as BTNS
nodes..." in section 2.
> Either way I'll put this on the agenda for next week.
More information about the ANONSEC