[e2e] Re: UDP vs. TCP distribution

[Panos GEVROS]

it is true that providers care about the exchanged volume - and that packet 
statistics are much easier to gather compared to flow statistics -
 still "flow" statistics  would  be very interesting (e.g active flows per 
T-sec, for some defintion of flow)
does anyone know whether such data have been published anywhere

cheers,
Panos


Vijay Gill writes:
 |On Sun, 4 Mar 2001, Alberto Cerpa wrote:
 |
 | [snip snip]
 |
 |
 |Some data regarding flows from the Pacific Rim to the US. Keep in mind
 |that the sampling rate used was fairly low.
 |
 |period:  03/04/2001 15:55:18 - 03/05/2001 15:55:19 PST
 |Protocol           Pkts       Pkts/sec          Bytes       Bits/sec
 |--------  -------------  -------------  -------------  -------------
 |     tcp        4566586             52     1118739284         103585
 |    icmp          97183              1       59403325           5500
 |     udp         207550              2       33848925           3134
 |     esp           2019              0        1216156            112
 |    skip            673              0         337732             31
 |     gre            298              0          94225              8
 |    ipip             93              0          49844              4
 |    ospf            108              0          33204              3
 |    ipv6             14              0           1327              0
 |    rsvp              5              0            580              0
 |
 |the rsvp is an anomaly.
 |
 |/vijay