UDP vs. TCP distribution [was: Re: [e2e] Can feedback be
vijay at umbc.edu
Thu Mar 8 09:39:16 PST 2001
On Thu, 8 Mar 2001, Bob Braden wrote:
> *> ipv6 14 0 1327 0
> *> rsvp 5 0 580 0
> *> the rsvp is an anomaly.
> "anomaly"? What does that mean? If you mean statistically, it would
> appear that IPv6 is also an anomaly.
Apologies for being cryptic. RSVP was a misconfiguration somewhere; once
fixed, it did not come back. There are some people who feverently wish
that v6 could also be fixed and not come back, so I'm watching the links
with an eagle eye.
More information about the end2end-interest