[e2e] TCP Framing
craig at aland.bbn.com
Mon Mar 26 05:46:00 PST 2001
In message <Pine.LNX.4.21.0103231457510.7855-100000 at pescado.lanl.gov>, Mike Fis
>I assume the argument is that it is inefficient to scan and twiddle bytes
>and that some out-of-band (ala packet segmentation) framing looks cheaper.
COBS is a very efficient byte stuffing that doesn't require much byte
scanning. If you're asking the question, you might go looks at Cheshire's
SIGCOMM paper and see how COBS might fit.
More information about the end2end-interest