[e2e] ICMP & TCP segments with IP ID = 0?
ak at muc.de
Wed May 16 10:51:58 PDT 2001
On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 07:20:44PM +0200, Greg Minshall wrote:
> > Why are they evil? ipid is only useful for defragmentation, and perhaps
> > to recover from bugs in IP checksum ...
> i think this is one of those "be conservative in what you send" things. the
> conservative thing to do, i would argue, is to obey the principle of least
> surprise and send unique IDs; this is what systems expect, orthogonal from DF
> or not DF. (of course, the rest of the world should obey the second half: "be
> liberal in what you accept", and so deal with ID == 0.)
The problem is that generating them is relatively costly for various
reasons in current linux (it's a longer story why that is so), and as there
was no good reason found to keep them they were turned off for DF=0.
Also I generally don't believe IP IDs are very useful for anything anymore
with current network speeds, the 16bit space is simply far too small and
wraps in a jiffy on any reasonable network
(fortunately fragmentation is not too common anymore and mostly only used
on low latency links, otherwise it would be surely a bigger problem).
More information about the end2end-interest