[e2e] the evolution of deployability

[Fred Baker]

At 01:58 PM 12/17/2002 -0500, J. Noel Chiappa wrote:
>     > The primary motivation for NATs is not selling boxes, but the
>     > exorbitant cost of IPv4 addresses.
>
>A point I missed making previously: I suspect box vendors could make just as
>much money selling IPv6 widgets as they could selling NAT boxes.

in point of fact, the same box will often do both.