[e2e] evolution of bandwidth as a term
Cannara
cannara at attglobal.net
Thu Oct 2 15:36:08 PDT 2003
The moral of any story like this, Noel, is: "Never give up." There's a
better phrase in an old Henry Fonda movie, but some might be offended. :]
If nothing else, from this discussion, some new students can learn how weak
and frivolous even vaunted academes can be.
Alex
"J. Noel Chiappa" wrote:
>
> > From: John Day <day at std.com>
>
> > Getting terms right and sticking to them is crucial for all scientific
> > pursuits, if not intellectual pursuits.
>
> You have provided an irresistable hook for one of my favourite quotations:
>
> "I am far from thinking that nomenclature is a remedy for every defect in
> art or science: still I cannot but feel that confusion of terms generally
> springs from, and always leads to, confusion of ideas."
>
> - John Louis Petit, "Architectural Studies in France", 1854
>
> which a friend of mine located some years ago.
>
> Alas, I'm going to slightly disagree with you about terminology: sometimes
> you do just have to stand back and get out of the way of the masses. If
> everyone decides <foo> means <bar>, then you pretty much have to live with
> it, and if <foo> used to mean <quux>, where <bar> and <quux> are
> well-defined, different, concepts, then you need to come up with a new label
> for <quux>.
>
> I lost this fight some years ago for "address", which in computer science
> (unlike the real world) now includes a meaning of "who" as well as "where".
> We had to make up "locator" to have a term that only meant "where".
> (Actually, "locator" originally had an even more specialized meaning, but the
> masses took it over and defined it as "where". You can't win....)
>
> So I think the fight may be lost on "bandwidth", alas...
>
> Noel
More information about the end2end-interest
mailing list