[e2e] a new IRTF group on Transport Models

Craig Partridge craig at aland.bbn.com
Fri Jun 3 07:38:32 PDT 2005


I was part of a team that looked at the particular problem of distinguishing
packet drop cause in detail recently.  See, for instance,

    http://www.ir.bbn.com/documents/articles/krishnan_cn04.pdf

You don't get as much leverage as you'd hope from knowing the cause of
packet drops.

Craig

In message <060320051330.21079.42A05B58000004B600005257220588601496040108020A9B
9C0E0500 at comcast.net>, frank at kastenholz.org writes:

>Sally
>
>Is there any thought to identifying information
>that routers and end systems might provide that
>either can be fed back into the models to refine
>them or used in parallel to (in)validate them?
>
>A simple example might be packet drops. If models 
>assume that the only reason packets are dropped is
>overflowing queues due to congestion, that leads to
>certain conclusions, etc, and tweaking our transport
>protocols in a certain direction. But if it turns
>out that a significant percentage of packet drops
>is because of something else, then that conclusion
>would be incorrect...
>
>Frank Kastenholz
>
>


More information about the end2end-interest mailing list