[e2e] a new IRTF group on Transport Models

Cannara cannara at attglobal.net
Tue Jun 7 12:40:58 PDT 2005

The operative words are "could be", which is exactly why we need better stuff
to get rid of "could".


Clark Gaylord wrote:
> Joseph Ishac wrote:
> >So, I'm a bit curious about the timidness to continue sending at a high
> >rate when faced with a large amount of corruption.  If you are indeed
> >
> >
> as example: corruption could be cell loss.  cell loss could be due to
> congestion.
> --ckg

More information about the end2end-interest mailing list