[e2e] end to end arguments in systems design
L.Wood at surrey.ac.uk
Fri Dec 7 12:54:21 PST 2007
>On 2007-12-6, at 19:14, ext Lloyd Wood wrote:
>> Two examples that spring to mind are in the output of the IRTF Delay
>> Tolerant Networking (DTN) research group - the DTN bundle protocol
>> (now published as RFC5050) and the Licklider transport protocol
>> Yes, these protocols are being published as IRTF experimental
> Thanks for clarifying. I was worried for a minute that you were
> referring to transport area standards track protocols.
Consider our moving Saratoga from DTNRG to TSVWG and
draft-wood-tsvwg-saratoga-00 (as discussed with you in Chicago)
a vote of confidence in the transport area and its processes.
> (And the rest of your email clarifies that you're concerned about the
> inner workings of DTNRG and what impact that has on their Experimental
> RFCs, and not on the workings of IETF WGs in this space. But shouldn't
> you bring this up on the DTNRG list, rather than that of a the E2E RG?)
My previous email summarised months of bringing this to the
<http://www.ee.surrey.ac.uk/Personal/L.Wood/><L.Wood at surrey.ac.uk>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the end2end-interest