[e2e] Collaboration on Future Internet Architectures
lachlan.andrew at gmail.com
Fri May 4 12:59:51 PDT 2007
On 04/05/07, David P. Reed <dpreed at reed.com> wrote:
> Nothing magic about MIMO in this regard.
> Lachlan Andrew wrote:
> > Thermal noise in the radio frount-end...
> I agree, but thermal noise in the radio front-end is a controllable of
> the radio design of the front-end - it's not a limit on capacity that
> depends either on the number of radios or on the environment in which
> the radios operate.
True, but if we ignore noise that is independent between receivers, I
doubt that N (and hence S) would be big enough to do much
cooking-with-narrowband. However, I don't have figures, and would be
happy to be proved wrong :)
As an aside, it would be interesting to see if there are further
physical limits imposed by the need to have super-cooled receivers
near our hot transmitters; could the shielding intrinsically interfere
with the radiation patters or something? Maxwell's daemon comes to
> > ... if we have a single receiver. That is why David Tse's work is all
> > MIMO.
> Simple division has nothing to do with MIMO.
*grin* Oops. I wasn't thinking...
Lachlan Andrew Dept of Computer Science, Caltech
1200 E California Blvd, Mail Code 256-80, Pasadena CA 91125, USA
Phone: +1 (626) 395-8820 Fax: +1 (626) 568-3603
More information about the end2end-interest