[e2e] [SPAM] Re: a means to an end

David P. Reed dpreed at reed.com
Thu Nov 13 11:29:24 PST 2008


Maybe you have a different definition of "location" than I do, Joe.   I 
have provided many answers, and each one you fail to respond to, instead 
changing your definition of location.

Joe Touch wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
>
> David P. Reed wrote:
>   
>> Computation (measurement) doesn't necessarily have a single location
>> either.
>>     
>
> You've made that argument repeatedly, as I have made the point that
> having a location doesn't mean having a single point location.
>
>   
>> Your brain happily functions without a tiny homunculus that
>> makes the final decision.   A computer can make a decision without
>> representing the output of the decision in one place. 
>>     
>
> As can a tree fall in the forest without anyone to hear it. However,
> decisions that are hidden from the rest of the world are irrelevant; at
> some point, the brain components need to coordinate a decision (as do
> computer components), and the output is represented in a set of locations.
>
> There's no such thing as computation - or information - that has *no*
> location.
>
>   
>> A flock of geese
>> maneuvers (and hence makes decisions) without there ever being a
>> "command goose". 
>>     
>
> That's not quite correct; the lead goose is the one that others track in
> general (by feeling air currents); follower geese can initiate actions
> from their place backward, and the rest of the group will react when
> visual or auditory cues indicate (e.g., gunshots, trees falling in the
> forest, etc.).
>
>   
>> And a slime mold "decides" to turn from slime to a
>> stalk to a vermiform without a single decision maker.
>>     
>
> Emergent behavior is fine, but it's still coordinated either by
> chemical, mechanical, etc. means.
>
> However, as others have noted, we've strayed far afield of the original
> issue - that information has a location (even if not a *point*), as I
> asserted originally. If you have a counterexample - i.e., information
> that has *no* location, please provide it. Examples for which the
> location is spread out, but for which a location exist, do not disprove
> my assertion.
>
> Joe
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAkkcdKsACgkQE5f5cImnZrsYngCfSvSN9rp/yVOpptb/L7c9G4rR
> j1EAn3w5JffxsoQ6hDO3lFmQzWpBK1EV
> =2lEH
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>   


More information about the end2end-interest mailing list