[e2e] TCP improved closing strategies?

Vikram Visweswaraiah vikram.visweswaraiah at gmail.com
Tue Aug 18 15:33:05 PDT 2009


On Aug 12, 2009, at 2:51 PM, William Allen Simpson wrote:

>
> > With the advent of more widespread DNSsec deployment, more UDP sessions
> > are likely to fallover into TCP sessions.
> >
> > I've been informed that even today, with a more limited TCP activity,
> > busy servers cannot wait 2MSL to finish closing.
>
> One wonders how a web server survives...


Right, load balancing courtesy of multiple A records returned by the DNS
server in a different order per query, which begs the question:

Aren't DNS servers themselves configured with some level of redundancy that
helps with fault tolerance and load-balancing? Doesn't that mitigate the
problem?

-V
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.postel.org/pipermail/end2end-interest/attachments/20090818/765d87e4/attachment.html


More information about the end2end-interest mailing list