[e2e] Switched Ethernet is Not an End-to-End System; was Protocols breaking the end-to-end argument
detlef.bosau at web.de
Wed Nov 11 11:11:50 PST 2009
Richard Bennett wrote:
> In other words: does the success of Switched Ethernet suggest that
> it's better to think of network protocols as units of recursion than
> as collections of statically-placed functions that operate once and
> only once in the lifetime of a packet?
I've just had a very first glance at this discussion. (Thanks god, I
first wrote the post by Joe....)
However, I'm a bit curious what this discussion is all about.
Many of us enjoy Switched Ethernet, me too. However, what is the very
issue with switched Ethernet from the end to end arguments point of view?
And second: Shall switched Ethernet replace TCP/IP?
If not: What is this argument all about?
Detlef Bosau Galileistraße 30 70565 Stuttgart
phone: +49 711 5208031 mobile: +49 172 6819937 skype: detlef.bosau
ICQ: 566129673 detlef.bosau at web.de http://www.detlef-bosau.de
More information about the end2end-interest