[e2e] Protocols breaking the end-to-end argument

Noel Chiappa jnc at mercury.lcs.mit.edu
Sun Oct 25 08:24:34 PDT 2009

    > From: John Day <day at std.com>

    > This is why I was so shocked when the IETF refused to name the node in
    > 1992. ... That was when it became clear that the IETF had become more a
    > craft guild than an engineering group and relied more stock in
    > tradition.

Some of us still have the scars on our foreheads from that one... :-)

    > There was a further simplification that we couldn't see at that point.

To get back to actual technical content, that would be...? (I'm sure it's
obvious, but it's not coming up for me...)


More information about the end2end-interest mailing list