[e2e] Protocols breaking the end-to-end argument
craig at aland.bbn.com
Mon Oct 26 07:10:33 PDT 2009
> If folks at BBN were still talking about X.25, they were way behind the
> curve, or were badly infected with severe standard-committee-itis.
Recall that part of BBN's networking team was paid by NIST to represent
the US at ISO/CCITT meetings. So BBN was simultaneously pushing ahead
on TCP/IP work AND working with ISO/CCITT on ISO standards.
Add to this that it was official US policy at the time that they'd
transition from TCP/IP to the OSI standards, and so there was much
effort inside BBN to try to get the OSI standards to a good enough
state to be transitioned to, and there was pushback from other
countries represented at ISO, and you have the internal debates.
More information about the end2end-interest