[e2e] 64-bit timestamps?

David P. Reed dpreed at reed.com
Tue Sep 8 17:58:09 PDT 2009

List moderator - please suspend Simpson's privileges; the rules suggest 
that his obnoxious behavior towards a helpful comment demand moderation 
until he stops behaving this way.

On 09/08/2009 06:42 PM, William Allen Simpson wrote:
> David P. Reed wrote:
>> In regard to DNS security issues, ...  But PAWS may not be useful, 
>> since DNS itself might be made to maintain state across connections, 
>> moving the problem out of TCP and into the app (DNS) layer where it 
>> probably belongs.
> This has no relation to the question that I asked, which has no mention
> what-so-ever about DNS security.  Nor did I find the cut and paste of an
> old familiar RFC appendix particularly informative, not even in fancy
> multi-part alternative html (instead of the native format)....
> In any case, I've been paying attention to the more recent 1323bis.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.postel.org/pipermail/end2end-interest/attachments/20090908/dc8810e6/attachment.html

More information about the end2end-interest mailing list