[e2e] Discrete IP - retake

Pars Mutaf pars.mutaf at gmail.com
Tue Sep 18 03:26:45 PDT 2012

I refuse to enter technical discussion, e.g. feasible or not, before
understanding ***what we want.****

If no one agrees with this research method, I won't have any feedback.
That's OK.

I am not surprised by your reaction because, currently we publish the
feasibility of ideas, not the ideas themselves.

This doesn't mean that Discrete IP is not feasible. This means that I am
honest beyond your comprehension.

On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 1:22 PM, Eggert, Lars <lars at netapp.com> wrote:

> On Sep 18, 2012, at 12:16, Pars Mutaf <pars.mutaf at gmail.com> wrote:
> > What you don't seem to understand is that the research method currently
> > used on this planet is a wrong one.
> >
> > We should first discuss the idea, then discuss the technical details.
> I refuse to discuss ideas that are articulated so vaguely that they cannot
> be understood. You refuse to expand on them in your memo. I guess we won't
> be having a discussion. I can live with that.
> Lars

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.postel.org/pipermail/end2end-interest/attachments/20120918/32dec1a5/attachment.html

More information about the end2end-interest mailing list