[e2e] VJCC vs. Keshav
emmanuel.lochin at isae.fr
Tue Apr 16 07:33:44 PDT 2013
I think this is a deployment problem. XCP would be a better solution too
but the deployment is complex.
On 16/04/2013 14:38, Detlef Bosau wrote:
> I'm curious, why the proposal by Keshav (his PhD thesis on Internet
> Congestion Control) was not widely adopted but VJCC instead.
> The main difference is that VJCC is purely end to end, while Keshav
> proposes schedulers on each node.
> Was this decision made for scalability reasons?
Professeur ISAE - OSSI
Institut Supérieur de l'Aéronautique et de l'Espace (ISAE)
Issu du rapprochement SUPAERO et ENSICA
10 avenue Edouard Belin - BP 54032 - 31055 Toulouse cedex 4
Tel : 05 61 33 91 85 - Fax : 05 61 33 91 88
Web : http://personnel.isae.fr/emmanuel-lochin/
"This email and any attachments are confidential. They may contain legally privileged information or copyright material. You should not read, copy, use or disclose them without authorisation. If you are not an intended recipient, please contact us at once by return email and then delete both messages. We do not accept liability in connection with computer virus, data corruption, delay, interruption, unauthorised access or unauthorised amendment. This notice should not be removed"
More information about the end2end-interest