[e2e] j'accuse NFV

Djamel Sadok jamel at cin.ufpe.br
Mon May 4 05:27:05 PDT 2015


May be we could also give the end user flow the possibility to say that it
does not want to have its data packets processed by any NFV or even black
list some NFVs (types of functions) on the path. Would this be possible to
achieve? would it render NFV ineffective? can both NFV and Not NFV (bypass
it) on given flows live together?


On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 10:14 PM, Matt Mathis <mattmathis at google.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 3:26 PM, <l.wood at surrey.ac.uk> wrote:
> > Ah, j'accuse TLA.
> >
> SDN is not is the same bucket, let me assure you.
> As for TCP, good algorithms are portable between protocols, bad algorithms
> are dangerous at any scale.   Once you fully deconstruct the protocol, I
> don't care so much about the packet format.
> Thanks,
> --MM--
> The best way to predict the future is to create it.  - Alan Kay
> Privacy matters!  We know from recent events that people are using our
> services to speak in defiance of unjust governments.   We treat privacy and
> security as matters of life and death, because for some users, they are.
> _______________________________________________
> end2end-interest mailing list
> end2end-interest at postel.org
> http://mailman.postel.org/mailman/listinfo/end2end-interest
> Contact list-owner at postel.org for assistance.

More information about the end2end-interest mailing list