[rbridge] PS issue #1

[Spencer Dawkins]

Thanks (to Guillermo) for providing this pointer.

I wasn't trying to imply that we could ignore the proposal, I just didn't 
have a reference that we could use to consider it.

I still agree with Eric on "don't expect both in the same bridged network, 
but don't break when someone (accidentally) turns on both in the same 
bridged network".

Spencer

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Guillermo Ibáñez" <gibanez at it.uc3m.es>

>>Since Shortest Path Bridging appears to target a similar problem
>>space, I don't think it makes sense for us to try to compete with
>>that as a solution.  However, we will need to establish that we
>>are not "breaking" it either...
>
>Agree - my point here was more like "this only exists as a tutorial
>presentation so far, we'll need to come back to it when we are closer to
>publishing".
>
>Spencer
>
>
The proposal of this document on Shortest Path Bridging  is far more
than a "tutorial" to be ignored.

http://www.ieee802.org/1/files/public/docs2005/new-seaman-shortest-path-0305-02.pdf
Regards
Guillermo

>_______________________________________________
>rbridge mailing list
>rbridge at postel.org
>http://www.postel.org/mailman/listinfo/rbridge
>
>
>

-- 
Guillermo Ibáñez
Departamento de Ingeniería Telemática
Universidad Carlos III de Madrid
1.1.B.11 Colmenarejo 91-6241393
4.1.F.13 Leganés 91-6248794

_______________________________________________
rbridge mailing list
rbridge at postel.org
http://www.postel.org/mailman/listinfo/rbridge