[rbridge] Draft minutes posted

[Ali Sajassi (sajassi)]

Yes, if there is any reason as to why .1ah encap cannot be used, then I
would like to hear it.

-Ali 



> -----Original Message-----
> From: rbridge-bounces at postel.org 
> [mailto:rbridge-bounces at postel.org] On Behalf Of Don Fedyk
> Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 10:17 AM
> To: Developing a hybrid router/bridge.
> Subject: Re: [rbridge] Draft minutes posted
> 
> Hi Erik
> 
> In the minutes: 
> 802.1ah header synergy?  On this point myself, and I recall 
> Ali Sajassi and Donald Oconnor all stood up and said that 
> 802.1ah is going to be a standard encapsulation header. My 
> point was Trill should see what it could deliver on this 
> encapsulation before inventing similar but different headers.
> 
> Regards,
> Don  
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: rbridge-bounces at postel.org
> > At http://www3.ietf.org/proceedings/06nov/minutes/trill.txt
> > 
> > Any corrections?
> > 
> >     Erik
> > 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rbridge mailing list
> rbridge at postel.org
> http://mailman.postel.org/mailman/listinfo/rbridge
>