[rbridge] Draft minutes posted
gibanez at it.uc3m.es
Thu Dec 7 06:22:31 PST 2006
Yes but, could you be a bit more precise ? (there are so many "VLANs" in
the headers :-) ). Do you mean a different protocol type than .1ah (81a8)?
Stewart Bryant escribió:
> Guillermo Ibáñez wrote:
>> There is no TTL field on the 802.1ah, afaik, so the .1ah would
>> require modification.
> ... or perhaps extension through the header extension mechanism
> used to introduce VLANs. i.e. new protocol type that introduces
> the TTL header which carries the TTL and the next protocol type.
> - Stewart
More information about the rbridge