[rbridge] Ingress Rbridge and FTAG again

[Joe Touch]

Dinesh G Dutt wrote:
> Hi Eric,
> 
> Gray, Eric wrote:
>> The argument that "You're changing things, and while you're at it,
>> why not change these other things" is a particularly obnoxious old 
>> Dinosaur.  
>>   
> I have shown the reasons and with the exception of you and Joe, I 
> haven't heard any objection to including the ingress Rbridge (at least) 
> or the FTAG. So, from a democratic spirit, it is upto you two to give us 
> technical reasons for objecting instead of saying "its not in the
> charter" or "you can't change that". The charter doesn't explicitly 
> forbid doing traceroute, for example.

Charters define what is permitted; that which is not permitted is
prohibited, unless it is needed to support what is permitted.

Otherwise, charters would be wide-open to anything not prohibited; we
don't have time to enumerate that list.

Joe

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 250 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://mailman.postel.org/pipermail/rbridge/attachments/20061023/02c8c01a/signature.bin