[rbridge] mtu question

[Jeff Pickering]

Meaning the type 22 would change?

Any idea when the pending changes will be available?

Jeff

________________________________
From: Donald Eastlake [mailto:d3e3e3 at gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 04, 2009 1:22 PM
To: Jeff Pickering
Cc: rbridge at postel.org
Subject: Re: [rbridge] mtu question

Hi Jeff,

There are a lot of changes and additions to draft-ietf-isis-layer2 that are pending.

I think it is likely that the MTU information in Hellos would be in the TRILL Neighbor TLV.

Thanks,
Donald
=============================
Donald E. Eastlake 3rd   +1-508-634-2066 (home)
155 Beaver Street
Milford, MA 01757 USA
d3e3e3 at gmail.com<mailto:d3e3e3 at gmail.com>


On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 10:44 AM, Jeff Pickering <jeffpick at broadcom.com<mailto:jeffpick at broadcom.com>> wrote:

The following text describes an optional mtu link attribute:


R. Perlman, et al                                              [Page 45]





INTERNET-DRAFT                                          RBridge Protocol





   for RB2 in RB1's Hello.  If size X succeeds, and X > Sz, then RB1

   advertises the largest tested X for each adjacency in the TRILL

   Hellos RB1 sends on that link, and RB1 MAY advertise X as an

   attribute of the link to RB2 in RB1's LSP.





As this is not per-RB, its not a TLV 14. And I dont see such a tlv/subtlv in either rfc 5305, 5029 or

the isis-layer2 draft. Can anyone tell me where this goes?



Thanks,

Jeff



_______________________________________________
rbridge mailing list
rbridge at postel.org<mailto:rbridge at postel.org>
http://mailman.postel.org/mailman/listinfo/rbridge


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.postel.org/pipermail/rbridge/attachments/20091104/e6a40de0/attachment.html