[e2e] interaction between TCP and rate limiting in routers
Antonio Jose Elizondo
ajea at tid.es
Tue Apr 2 07:08:22 PST 2002
Hi, I am also a lurker on this list, and also read it from time to (much) time.
I presented a paper on "Capped Leaky Buckets" in ITC17 (2001). The goal of this
bucket consists of providing a configured rate to each TCP flow.
I've looked for the ITC17 proceedings in the web, but it seems that they are not
published. However, you can find a previous work in the web, where capped leaky
buckets are introduced:
If anybody wants the most recent paper, the ITC17 version, please let me know.
Antonio J. Elizondo
JFellows at coppermountain.com wrote:
> I'm a long time lurker on this list, but would like to now raise an issue
> that I suspect is old hat to many of the members of this list.
> I'm searching for the current best practice for implementing per flow or per
> subscriber rate limits in edge routers. This is becoming a common request
> from consumer oriented ISPs in both the cable and DSL markets. I've done
> the Google search and read a half dozen papers that touch on this subject.
> Many of the published papers refer to the classic 'sawtooth' behaviour of
> TCP in this configuration. Some suggest that, in order to avoid multiple
> consecutive discards, the token bucket that implements the rate limiter
> should have a depth at least equal to the RTT*configured rate.
> Are there any non-invasive (not involving on-the-fly modification of TCP
> headers) implementations of rate limiters that allow TCP to run fairly
> smoothly at the configured rate?
More information about the end2end-interest