[e2e] was double blind, now reproduceable results

David P. Reed dpreed at reed.com
Wed May 19 16:43:02 PDT 2004

At 04:11 PM 5/19/2004, Jon Crowcroft wrote:
>well this doesnt argue that we should publish part of the experiment,
>but even more strongly then that a unique observation should be
>captured more completely.
I don't disagree with making all the data available, and that is almost 
always possible, even where reproducibility is hard. 

More information about the end2end-interest mailing list