[e2e] was double blind, now reproduceable results
jonathan at dsg.stanford.edu
Wed May 19 17:16:01 PDT 2004
In message <188.8.131.52.2.20040519194147.05b61bc8 at 127.0.0.1>"David P. Reed" writes
>At 04:11 PM 5/19/2004, Jon Crowcroft wrote:
>>well this doesnt argue that we should publish part of the experiment,
>>but even more strongly then that a unique observation should be
>>captured more completely.
>I don't disagree with making all the data available, and that is almost
>always possible, even where reproducibility is hard.
With the notable exception of whole-payload packet traces. If you can
get permission to collect them at all, its well-nigh impossible to
redistribute them. For obvious and excellent reasons.
More information about the end2end-interest