AW: [e2e] Congestion control is not mandatory?
michael.welzl at uibk.ac.at
Tue Sep 14 15:02:42 PDT 2004
> > This is curious ... it just occured to me that RFC 2581 is
> > just a Proposed Standard.
> > That means that I can build a fully conformant TCP/IP
> > which does not do congestion control, doesn't it?
> RFC 1122 says (on page 89):
> Recent work by Jacobson [TCP:7] on Internet congestion and TCP
> retransmission stability has produced a transmission algorithm
> combining "slow start" with "congestion avoidance". A TCP MUST
> implement this algorithm.
> So that's a "no." Or maybe a MUST NOT.
Ok, so you answered my question. Still, there are the somewhat
weird facts that i) here's a standard RFC referencing a paper
(not an RFC) with MUST implement while there's an RFC that
specifies what's needed, and ii) RFC 2581 is a Proposed Standard.
Heck, if that is not a Standard, what is? Do we need more
More information about the end2end-interest