[e2e] It's all my fault
djm at mindrot.org
Mon May 14 19:38:20 PDT 2007
On Mon, 14 May 2007, David P. Reed wrote:
> Joe Touch wrote:
> > Discussions of the issues is, as always, welcome.
> No problem. I am eager to discuss the basic rationale fo9r removing an
> end-to-end capability from users to enhance the value of the network for
> applications. It should not be based on claims of harm that are
> unsubstantiated and unsubstantiatable.
> A factor of 80 in harm due to RH0 is baldly asserted. I'd like to see data,
> or a proof, or even a technical argument. If someone could point us to such a
> measurement of harm - in particular actual demonstrated harm, rather than fear
> of harm - that would be great.
It is a simple consequence of the fact that you can stuff over 40 address
pairs into a RH0, and each pair causes a round trip.
More information about the end2end-interest