[e2e] TCP Loss Differentiation
detlef.bosau at web.de
Mon Feb 23 09:42:30 PST 2009
Lars Eggert wrote:
> On 2009-2-21, at 3:46, David P. Reed wrote:
>> I think we have no serious debate on any of these things. I know
>> Cisco's products support ECN, it's really an endpoint stack problem, and
>> the word "lead" was meant to suggest use of Cisco's bully pulpit (white
>> papers, etc.).
> FYI - and this may be clear to you but maybe not to everyone - it's
> not so much an endpoint problem in the sense that ECN wasn't
> implemented, it's an endpoint problem in the sense that turning it on
> makes broken middleboxes misbehave,
Thank you for this strong argument in favour of the end to end principle.
It's always a good idea to assume nothing about middleboxes, it's a
better idea to assume less.
> o a degree where Microsoft for example has decided to leave it off in
> Vista. See Dave Thaler's slides from a recent IETF meeting:
> http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/07mar/slides/tsvarea-3/sld6.htm (and
> the one following)
I'm surprised that Microsoft is involved in the development of
Don't they provide these funny graphical programs for home computers? *SCNR*
> So we're realistically looking at a deployment delay of max(OS upgrade
> cycle, NAT upgrade cycle).
I was already surprised to find the term "NAT" mentioned here in the group.
I don't know the attitude of the community. But as far as the colleagues
are concerned I know of, NAT is considered to be simply an absolute NoNo.
To the best of my knowledge, its a strong consensus to overcome NAT as
soon as possible.
(However, there's some romour, that some folks want it for IPv6. But we
all know Einsteins famous quote about the infinity of the universe ;-))
I'm not quite sure whether we should pursue keepalives for things we
want to get rid of.
In this sense, I'm a strong advocate of the end to end principle. There
may be of course valid reasons for adding functions to middleboxes. But
we never should assume more about a middlebox' behaviour than it is
And this is not only a philsophical view.
The less functions a unit has, the less functions can be out of order.
It's simply a matter of robustness to keep things small and simple.
And it would be near to commit suicide for the Internet, if we would try
to follow the version numbers and flavours of MS windows.
Detlef Bosau Mail: detlef.bosau at web.de
Galileistrasse 30 Web: http://www.detlef-bosau.de
70565 Stuttgart Skype: detlef.bosau
Mobile: +49 172 681 9937
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 3351 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : http://mailman.postel.org/pipermail/end2end-interest/attachments/20090223/e40bcd98/smime.bin
More information about the end2end-interest