[e2e] TCP Loss Differentiation

[Detlef Bosau]

L.Wood at surrey.ac.uk wrote:
>
>
> A complete history isn't needed. The last couple of hundred
> ms should do it.
>

Depending on the technology in use, hundred ms may cover perhaps one or 
two rounds. Perhaps even less.

I'm not quite sure whether a statistical approach will be sufficient 
here, particularly in networks with varying packet corruption rates.


>


-- 
Detlef Bosau                          Mail:  detlef.bosau at web.de
Galileistrasse 30                     Web:   http://www.detlef-bosau.de
70565 Stuttgart                       Skype: detlef.bosau
Mobile: +49 172 681 9937

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3351 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : http://mailman.postel.org/pipermail/end2end-interest/attachments/20090224/5b8de7e1/smime.bin